



John Carpenter’s The Thing was released in 1982. A failure at the box office, mostly likely due to the fact that a little film called E.T. had come out earlier that year, The Thing would have to wait a couple years to arrive at its cult status through the advent of the VHS tape and cable.
Now, if for some strange reason you haven’t seen The Thing, stop what you are doing and cue up your Netflix (as of this writing it’s streaming) and see this film. I recently watched it again and was more than impressed by how well the film held up. Setting the insane cutting edge special effects aside, the film itself is a brilliant example of Carpenter’s taste for sparse, minimal shots and pacing, particularly in its early sequences.
As a designer, I’m interested in longevity so I avoid trends like the plague. Like many, I focus on timeless qualities and I find them everywhere, film itself being a particularly rich field for the study of timelessness. The Thing has an uncanny dedication to minimalism, so much so that it becomes almost a silent narrator. In fact, you may remember (I didn’t) that the very first shot we see of the creature contained no build-up music, nor is there any during the horrific scene itself. It’s a bold choice. One that would clearly not pass the weary eyes and ears of today’s Hollywood shareholders who seem to have very little interest in actually making a movie for any other reason than profit.
By the mid eighties, the heyday of the maverick director was over and studios began actively meddling in a films production and final cut. The age of the blockbuster had arrived and there was no denying it. Carpenter went with the flow practically dropping his penchant for minimalism as seen in The Thing and his brilliant and underrated 1976 film Assault on Precinct 13 giving audiences the safer Starman and the incredible Big Trouble in Little China, but I’ll always wonder what his later films would have looked like had The Thing been a smash hit. Nevertheless, the film stands the test of time and therefore I think deserves to be looked at beyond the obvious trappings of its genre and perhaps take a place amongst the standard titles that show up on any given film school 101 list.
Published //
May 10, 2011
Author //
Drew
Comments //
3
Post Tags //
Colorcubic, Design, Drew Wiltsey, Film, Flim making, Hollywood, John Carpenter, maverick Film, Minimalism, the thing
3 Comments
Leave a Comment
XHTML // You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
4
Loading...





















Identification
Yesss. The Thing FTW. It holds up, it’s sample-able, it’s great.
The only shot that stands out where the effects look dated is the matte painting of the ship itself, in my opinion.
Name //
John C. Worsley
Date //
May 10, 2011
to user
Identification
AGREED!! What a great film. Awesome John Carpenter music, solid performances and great special effect.
If only his other movies could hold up as well. Assault on Precint 13 is great, Christine was great, but Starman? Uggg man! And I like Big Trouble in Little China. Its pretty 80’s but in a fantastic way!
More timeless movie suggestions please!!
Name //
emanster provolone
Date //
May 11, 2011
to user
Identification
@ John: Yeah the matte painting, you’re right, it did stick out. As far as the FX are concerned, I’m still just as impressed as I was years ago. The creature(s) are so insane in concept that you can’t help but be impressed and or grossed out. Those poor dogs!
@Emanster: John Carpenter did the theme song to The Thing, but Ennio Morricone did the score(which is almost nonexistent). And if you want more timeless film suggestions, you got it.
Name //
Drew
Date //
May 12, 2011
to user